- Introduction
- Browse Exhibits
- Browse Archives
- Key Figures
- Timeline
- Covenants
- Archives
-
Student Archival Essays
- Australia and the Interwar Internationalism Movement
- In her study of the League of Nations Union in Britain, Helen McCarthy argues that “the League of Nations inspired a rich and participatory culture of political unrest, popular education and civic ritual." Was the same true in Australia?
- Interwar Internationalism: Refugees
- A Broad Unity for Peace: An historical examination of the International Peace Campaign’s Australian Peace Congress, 16th – 19th September, 1937
- Interwar Feminism in Australia and the League of Nations
- What were the primary factors in the failure of the League of Nations Union in Australia to create what Helen McCarthy terms a ‘rich and participatory culture of political protest, popular education and civic ritual’?
- Analyze how the ‘Myth of Collective Security’ was cultivated and evolved in Britain, compared to Australia by the LNU
- The League in Nations: the Effects of Identity
- Paths to Peace: A comparison of the voluntary peace groups in Britain and Australia
- The League of Nations: Lessons and Legacy
Australia - International
Australia’s role in promoting international peace was always going to be challenging due in part to the newness of the country, the size of its population and its geographic isolation. Following Australia’s participation in the Great War and its pursuance of peace alongside the League, Australia became increasingly involved in international relations and foreign policies. This exhibit offers an array of archives with relation to Australia and its relations with both Japan and Spain.
Japan was regarded as a Great Power, whose involvement was seen as essential to ensure the success of the League. Australia became involved in international relations with Japan through announcing a trade war against them on 22 May 1936 in order to protect British interests. [1] The Japanese retaliated on 25 June 1936 with a boycott of Australian wheat, wool and flour and the international retaliations continued until a provisional agreement was signed for the duration of 18 months commencing 1 January 1937.[2] This was largely a result of Japan abandoning the ‘gold standard’ in December 1931, which culminated in a 30% depreciation of the Yen in the last two weeks of December. Subsequently an exchange dumping duty as high as 65% was levied on Japanese goods and tensions rose due to these high import duties.[3] Moreover, Japan and Australia had differing values with regard racial equality. Australia, notably Prime Minister Hughes, pushed for the prevention of a racial equality clause, while Japan proposed a racial equality clause be included in the Covenant.[4]
Comparatively, Australia participated in international discussions with regard the Spanish Refugee Crisis following their civil war. The Spanish Civil War was fought between the Republicans and the Nationalists (with Fascist support) and the Republicans received international support in their fight against Fascism. The Australian labour government promoted principles against Fascism and War throughout the interwar period and implored the International Peace Campaign to offer support in the Refugee Crisis.
[1] T.B. Millar, Australia in Peace and War: External Relations Since 1788. (Botany: Maxwell Macmillan Publishing, 1991), 42.
[2] T.B. Millar, Australia in Peace and War: External Relations Since 1788. (Botany: Maxwell Macmillan Publishing, 1991), 42.
[3] Masako Osada, Sanctions and Honorary Whites: Diplomatic Policies and Economic Realities in Relations Between Japan and South Africa. (United States of America: Greenwood Press, 2002), 41.
[4] Andrew Carr, Winning the Peace: Australia’s Campaign to Change the Asia Pacific. (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2015), 69.