- Introduction
- Browse Exhibits
- Browse Archives
- Key Figures
- Timeline
- Covenants
- Archives
-
Student Archival Essays
- Australia and the Interwar Internationalism Movement
- In her study of the League of Nations Union in Britain, Helen McCarthy argues that “the League of Nations inspired a rich and participatory culture of political unrest, popular education and civic ritual." Was the same true in Australia?
- Interwar Internationalism: Refugees
- A Broad Unity for Peace: An historical examination of the International Peace Campaign’s Australian Peace Congress, 16th – 19th September, 1937
- Interwar Feminism in Australia and the League of Nations
- What were the primary factors in the failure of the League of Nations Union in Australia to create what Helen McCarthy terms a ‘rich and participatory culture of political protest, popular education and civic ritual’?
- Analyze how the ‘Myth of Collective Security’ was cultivated and evolved in Britain, compared to Australia by the LNU
- The League in Nations: the Effects of Identity
- Paths to Peace: A comparison of the voluntary peace groups in Britain and Australia
- The League of Nations: Lessons and Legacy
Peace on Earth
The Covenant of the League did not outlaw war, but rather placed limits on the instigation of war and promoted co-operative mediation with regard international disputes under Articles 11 and 12 as well as disarmament under Article 8. For this reason, a peace movement was pursued globally, drawing Australia into international relations. Not surprisingly for such a young country, Australia kept in line with the international, and British, agenda for disarmament. While theoretically approved by the Australian government, disarmament was considered to represent a reduction in armaments and an ideal that should be applied on an international level to other nations for world security but not necessarily on a national level.[1] At the 1932 Geneva Conference (Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Arms), Australia pushed for the abolition of chemical and bacteriological warfare and for disarmament to be taken in stages.[2] Moreover, it is interesting to note that the term ‘disarmament’ became a loaded word, used by politicians to connote peace and security, all the while armament policies continued to be pursued, merely at a reduced rate.[3]
[1] Hudson, Australia and the League of Nations (Paramatta: Sydney University Press, 1980), 102.
[2] T.B. Millar, Australia in Peace and War: External Relations Since 1788. (Botany: Maxwell Macmillan Publishing, 1991), 86.
[3] T.B. Millar, Australia in Peace and War: External Relations Since 1788. (Botany: Maxwell Macmillan Publishing, 1991), 95.